Efficacy of sodium hypochlorite and chlorhexidine against Enterococcus faecalis: a systematic review

Authors

  • Carlos Estrela Federal University of Goiás
  • Julio Almeida Silva Federal University of Goiás
  • Ana Helena Gonçalves de Alencar Federal University of Goiás
  • Claudio Rodrigues Leles Federal University of Goiás
  • Daniel Almeida Decurcio Federal University of Goiás

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.1590/S1678-77572008000600002

Keywords:

E. faecalis, Sodium hypochlorite, Chlorhexidine, Irrigating solutions, Systematic review

Abstract

The efficacy of the sodium hypochlorite (NaOCl) and chlorhexidine (CHX) on Enterococcus faecalis was evaluated by systematic review and meta-analysis. The search strategies included search in electronic biomedical journal databases (MEDLINE, EMBASE, CENTRAL) and handsearching records, using different matches of keywords for NaOCl, CHX and Enterococcus faecalis. From 41 in vivo studies, 5 studies met the inclusion criteria. In a sample containing 159 teeth, E. faecalis was detected initially in 16 (10%) teeth by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and 42 (26.4%) teeth by microbial culture techniques. After root canal disinfection, this species was observed in 11 (6.9%) teeth by PCR and 12 (7.5%) teeth by culture. Risk differences of included studies were combined as generic inverse variance data type (Review Manager Version 5.0 _ Cochrane Collaboration, http://www.cc-ims.net, accessed 15 May 2008), taking into account the separate tracking of positive and negative cultures/PCR. The level of statistical significance was set at p<0.05. In conclusion, NaOCl or CHX showed low ability to eliminate E. faecalis when evaluated by either PCR or culture techniques.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Downloads

Published

2008-12-01

Issue

Section

Original Articles

How to Cite

Estrela, C., Silva, J. A., Alencar, A. H. G. de, Leles, C. R., & Decurcio, D. A. (2008). Efficacy of sodium hypochlorite and chlorhexidine against Enterococcus faecalis: a systematic review . Journal of Applied Oral Science, 16(6), 364-368. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1678-77572008000600002