The new bone formation in human maxillary sinuses using two bone substitutes with different resorption types associated or not with autogenous bone graft: a comparative histomorphometric, immunohistochemical and randomized clinical study

Authors

  • Rodrigo dos Santos Pereira Universidade do Grande Rio (UNIGRANRIO); Centro Universitário Serra dos Órgãos (UNIFESO
  • João Paulo Bonardi Universidade Estadual Paulista Júlio de Mesquita Filho, Faculdade de Odontologia de Araçatuba, Araçatuba, SO
  • Felippe Ricardo Frossard Ouverney Centro Universitário Serra dos Órgãos (UNIFESO)
  • Annelise Backer Barros Centro Universitário Serra dos Órgãos (UNIFESO)
  • Geraldo Luiz Griza Universidade Estadual do Oeste do Paraná (UNIOESTE)
  • Roberta Okamoto Universidade Estadual Paulista Júlio de Mesquita Filho (UNESP)
  • Eduardo Hochuli-Vieira Universidade Estadual Paulista Júlio de Mesquita Filho (UNESP)

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.1590/1678-7757-2020-0568

Keywords:

Biomaterials, Bone substitutes, Sinus floor augmentation, Tissue physiology, Bone regeneration, Xenograft, Bioactive glass

Abstract

Objective: The aim of this study is to evaluate the new bone and connective tissue formation and the biomaterial remaining after maxillary sinus bone augmentation using 5 different bone substitutes. The osteocalcin immunolabeling was performed to demonstrate their calcification and the possibility of receiving dental implants. Methodology: 40 patients underwent maxillary sinus bone augmentation and were divided in 5 groups: Group 1 with 8 maxillary sinuses were grafted with autogenous bone graft (AB); Group 2 with 8 maxillary sinuses grafted with bioactive glass (BG); Group 3 with 8 maxillary sinuses grafted with bioactive glass added to autogenous bone graft (BG + AB) 1:1; Group 4 with 8 maxillary sinuses grafted with Bio-Oss (BO) and Group 5 with 8 maxillary sinuses grafted with Bio-Oss added to autogenous bone graft (BO + AB) 1:1. Results: In group AB, 37.8% of bone was formed in the pristine bone region, 38.1% in the intermediate and 44.5% in the apical region. In group BG, 43.6% was formed in the pristine bone, 37% in the intermediate and 49.3% in the apical region. In group BG + AB 1:1, 39.0% was formed in the pristine bone region, 34.8% in the intermediate and 36.8% in apical region. In group BO, 33.4% was formed in the pristine bone, 32.5% in the intermediate and 34.3% in the apical region. In group BO + AB 1:1, 32.8% was formed in the pristine bone, 36.1% in intermediate and 27.8% in the apical regions. The immunolabeling for osteocalcin showed an intensive staining for all groups, which could demonstrate the calcification of the bone formed. Conclusion: This study showed that the groups evaluated formed a suitable lamellar bone in the maxillary sinus reconstruction after six months of bone healing, thus being indicated to receive dental implants.

 

Downloads

Downloads

Published

2021-06-14

Issue

Section

Original Articles

How to Cite

Pereira, R. dos S., Bonardi, J. P., Ouverney, F. R. F. ., Barros, A. B., Griza, G. L. ., Okamoto, R. ., & Hochuli-Vieira, E. . (2021). The new bone formation in human maxillary sinuses using two bone substitutes with different resorption types associated or not with autogenous bone graft: a comparative histomorphometric, immunohistochemical and randomized clinical study. Journal of Applied Oral Science, 29, e20200568. https://doi.org/10.1590/1678-7757-2020-0568