Reliability, failure probability, and strength of resin-based materials for CAD/CAM restorations

Authors

  • Kiatlin Lim National University of Singapore; Faculty of Dentistry
  • Adrian U-Jin Yap JurongHealth Services; Department of Dentistry
  • Shruti Vidhawan Agarwalla National University of Singapore; Faculty of Dentistry
  • Keson Beng-Choon Tan National University of Singapore; Faculty of Dentistry
  • Vinicius Rosa National University of Singapore; Faculty of Dentistry

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.1590/1678-775720150561

Abstract

Objective: This study investigated the Weibull parameters and 5% fracture probability of direct, indirect composites, and CAD/CAM composites. Material and Methods: Discshaped (12 mm diameter x 1 mm thick) specimens were prepared for a direct composite [Z100 (ZO), 3M-ESPE], an indirect laboratory composite [Ceramage (CM), Shofu], and two CAD/CAM composites [Lava Ultimate (LU), 3M ESPE; Vita Enamic (VE), Vita Zahnfabrik] restorations (n=30 for each group). The specimens were polished, stored in distilled water for 24 hours at 37°C. Weibull parameters (m= modulus of Weibull, σ0= characteristic strength) and flexural strength for 5% fracture probability (σ5%) were determined using a piston-on-three-balls device at 1 MPa/s in distilled water. Statistical analysis for biaxial flexural strength analysis were performed either by both one-way ANOVA and Tukey's post hoc (α=0.05) or by Pearson's correlation test. Results: Ranking of m was: VE (19.5), LU (14.5), CM (11.7), and ZO (9.6). Ranking of σ0 (MPa) was: LU (218.1), ZO (210.4), CM (209.0), and VE (126.5). σ5% (MPa) was 177.9 for LU, 163.2 for CM, 154.7 for Z0, and 108.7 for VE. There was no significant difference in the m for ZO, CM, and LU. VE presented the highest m value and significantly higher than ZO. For σ0 and σ5%, ZO, CM, and LU were similar but higher than VE. Conclusion: The strength characteristics of CAD/ CAM composites vary according to their composition and microstructure. VE presented the lowest strength and highest Weibull modulus among the materials.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Downloads

Published

2016-10-01

Issue

Section

Original Articles

How to Cite

Lim, K., Yap, A. U.-J., Agarwalla, S. V., Tan, K. B.-C., & Rosa, V. (2016). Reliability, failure probability, and strength of resin-based materials for CAD/CAM restorations . Journal of Applied Oral Science, 24(5), 447-452. https://doi.org/10.1590/1678-775720150561