Transcutaneous electrical diaphragmatic stimulation (TEDS) for the respiratory muscle strengthening: randomized and controlled clinical study

Authors

  • Karina Maria Cancelliero Universidade Federal de São Carlos (UFSCar)
  • Daniela Ike FAC
  • Luciana Maria Malosá Sampaio Universidade Nove de Julho (UNINOVE)
  • Vera Lucia Alves dos Santos Santa Casa de Misericórdia de São Paulo; Departamento de Pneumologia
  • Roberto Stirbulov Santa Casa de Misericórdia de São Paulo; Departamento de Pneumologia
  • Dirceu Costa UFSCar

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.1590/S1809-29502012000400002

Keywords:

electrical stimulation, respiratory muscles, diaphragm, muscle strength, physical therapy specialty

Abstract

The objective of this study was to demonstrate the effect of two protocols of transcutaneous electrical diaphragmatic stimulation (TEDS) on the respiratory muscle strength of healthy women, with one protocol according to Geddes et al. (1988) and other protocol standardized by Phrenics equipment. Healthy women were divided in 3 groups: Control (n=7); TEDS with Phrenics (n=7) and TEDS with Dualpex (n=7). The treatment was made twice a week, during 6 weeks (12 sessions). Respiratory muscle strength was evaluated by maximal inspiratory pressure (MIP) and maximal expiratory pressure (MEP) before and after the treatment. The statistical analysis was made by the Shapiro-Wilk and the Kruskal Wallis test with Dunn's post-hoc test (p<0.05). Both TEDS protocols promoted increase in MIP (Phrenics: 32.9%; Dualpex: 63.2%) and in MEP (Phrenics: 44.7%; Dualpex: 60.9%), differently of the Control that didn't show difference. In conclusion, the two TEDS' protocols promoted increase of inspiratory and expiratory muscle strength in healthy women.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Published

2012-12-01

Issue

Section

Original Research

How to Cite

Transcutaneous electrical diaphragmatic stimulation (TEDS) for the respiratory muscle strengthening: randomized and controlled clinical study . (2012). Fisioterapia E Pesquisa, 19(4), 303-308. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1809-29502012000400002