Electrophysical agents in clinical practice of orthopedic and sports physical therapists in Brazil

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.1590/1809-2950/19019727022020

Keywords:

Electric Stimulation Therapy, Ultrasonic Therapy

Abstract

Studies have described the use of electrophysical agents (EPA) by physical therapists worldwide. However, the use of EPA by Brazilian physical therapists remains undetermined. This study aims to describe the availability, use, and perception about EPA by orthopedic and sports physical therapists in Brazil. Professionals of the area were invited to answer an online questionnaire. Demographic data and information regarding the availability, use and perception about EPA in their current clinical practice were asked. Out of 376 physical therapists included in this study, 89% declared to use EPA in clinical practice. Sensory electrotherapy with pulsed current (TENS), therapeutic ultrasound, excitomotor electrotherapy with pulsed current (FES/NMES), and cryotherapy are available for more than 3/4 of interviewees. Scientific articles and clinical experience, respectively, are the most influential factors for the choice of EPA. Ultrasound is the most frequently used EPA, followed by TENS, cryotherapy, photobiomodulation, hot packs, and FES/NMES. The top-five most useful EPA in clinical practice chosen by physical therapists are: (1) ultrasound; (2) photobiomodulation; (3) TENS; (4) cryotherapy; and (5) FES/NMES. In conclusion, EPA are widely used by Electric Stimulation Therapy

orthopedic and sports physical therapists in Brazil. Therapeutic ultrasound, TENS, FES/NMES, photobiomodulation, cryotherapy, and hot packs are the most used EPA in clinical practice of these physiotherapists.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

World Confederation for Physical Therapy subgroups. International

Society for Electrophysical Agents in Physical Therapy (ISEAPT)

[Internet]. Milwaukee: Marquette University; 2017 [cited 2017

Oct 13]. Available from: http://www.wcpt.org/iseapt

Canadian Physiotherapy Association. Electrophysical Agents:

contraindications and precautions: an evidence-based approach

to clinical decision making in physical therapy. Physiother Can.

;62(5):1-80. doi: 10.3138/ptc.62.5

Cameron M. Physical agents in rehabilitation: from research

to practice. Sant Louis: Elsevier; 2003.

Robertson VJ, Chipchase L, Laakso E, Whelan K, McKenna,

L. Guidelines for the clinical use of electrophysical agents.

Melbourne: Australian Physiotherapy Association; 2001.

Watson T. The role of electrotherapy in contemporary

physiotherapy practice. Man Ther. 2000;5(3):132-41. doi:

1054/math.2000.0363

Chipchase L. Is there a future for electrophysical agents in

musculoskeletal physiotherapy? Man Ther. 2012;17(4):265-6.

doi: 10.1016/j.math.2012.04.001

Crosbie J, Gass E, Jull G, Morris M, Rivett D, Ruston S,

et al. Sustainable undergraduate education and professional

competency. Aust J Physiother. 2002;48(1):5-7. doi: 10.1016/

S0004-9514(14)60276-2

Laakso EL, Robertson VJ, Chipchase LS. The place of

electrophysical agents in Australian and New Zealand entry-level

curricula: is there evidence for their inclusion? Aust J Physiother.

;48(4):251-4. doi: 10.1016/S0004-9514(14)60164-1

Lindsay D, Dearness J, Richardson C, Chapman A, Cuskelly G.

A survey of electromodality usage in private physiotherapy

practices. Aust J Physiother. 1990;36(4):249-6. doi: 10.1016/

S0004-9514(14)60527-4

Robertson VJ, Spurritt D. Electrophysical agents: implications

of their availability and use in undergraduate clinical

placements. Physiotherapy. 1998;84(7):335-44. doi: 10.1016/

S0031-9406(05)63462-1

Chipchase L, Williams MT, Robertson V. A national study of

the availability and use of electrophysical agents by Australian

physiotherapists. Physiother Theor Pract. 2009;25(4):279-6.

doi: 10.1080/09593980902782611

Taylor E, Humphry R. Survey of physical agent modality use.

Am J Occup Ther. 1991;45(10):924-31. doi: 10.5014/ajot.45.10.924

Greco J, Lamberg EM, McKenna RF, Muratori LM. Trends

in availability and usage of biophysical agents among

physical therapists in the United States. Phys Ther Rev.

;23:(2);116-23. doi: 10.1080/10833196.2018.1449921

Lindsay D, Dearness J, McGinley C. Electrotherapy usage

trends in private physiotherapy practice in Alberta. Physiother

Can. 1995;47(1):30-4.

Pope GD, Mockett SP, Wright JP. A survey of electrotherapeutic

modalities: ownership and use in the NHS in England. Physiotherapy.

;81(2):82-91. doi: 10.1016/S0031-9406(05)67050-2

Cooney M, Gallen C, Mullins G. A survey of ownership and

use of electrotherapeutic modalities in public outpatient

departments and private practice in the Republic of Ireland.

Physiother Irel. 2000;21:3-8.

Springer S, Laufer Y, Elboim-Gabyzon M. Clinical decision

making for using electro-physical agents by physiotherapists,

an Israeli survey. Isr J Health Policy Res. 2015;4:14-9. doi:

1186/s13584-015-0015-x

Abe Y, Goh A, Kei Miyoshi K. Availability, usage, and factors

affecting usage of electrophysical agents by physical

therapists: a regional cross-sectional survey. J Phys Ther Sci.

;28(11):3088-94. doi: 10.1589/jpts.28.3088

Shah SGS, Farrow A. Trends in the availability and usage

of electrophysical agents in physiotherapy practices from

to 2010: a review. Phys Ther Rev. 2012;17(4):207-26. doi:

1179/1743288X12Y.0000000007

CoFFiTO-Conselho Federal de Fisioterapia e Terapia

Ocupacional. Perguntas mais frequentes: quantitativo de

profissionais [Internet]. Brasília, DF: Coffito, 2018 [cited 2019

Jan 20]. Available from: http://www.coffito.gov.br

Silva TM, Costa LC, Garcia AN, Costa LO. What do

physical therapists think about evidence-based practice?

A systematic review. Man Ther. 2015;20(3):388-401. doi:

1016/j.math.2014.10.009

Herbert R, Jamtvedt G, Hagen KB, Mead J. Practical evidencebased physiotherapy. 2nd ed. Oxford: Elsevier, 2011.

Wu Y, Zhu S, Lv Z, Kan S, Wu Q, Song W, et al. Effects of

therapeutic ultrasound for knee osteoarthritis: a systematic

review and meta-analysis. Clin Rehabil. 2019;33(12):1863-75.

doi: 10.1177/0269215519866494

Zhu Y, Feng Y, Peng L. Effect of transcutaneous electrical

nerve stimulation for pain control after total knee arthroplasty:

a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Rehabil Med.

;49(9):700-4. doi: 10.2340/16501977-2273

Griffin XL, Parsons N, Costa ML, Metcalfe D. Ultrasound

and shockwave therapy for acute fractures in adults.

Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014;23;(6):CD008579. doi:

1002/14651858.CD008579.pub3

Ebadi S, Henschke N, Nakhostin Ansari N, Fallah E, van

Tulder MW. Therapeutic ultrasound for chronic low-back

pain. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014;(3):CD009169. doi:

1002/14651858.CD009169.pub2

Brosseau L, Casimiro L, Welch V, Milne S, Shea B, Judd M,

et al. WITHDRAWN: Therapeutic ultrasound for treating

patellofemoral pain syndrome. Cochrane Database Syst Rev.

;(2):CD003375. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003375.pub2

Gibson W, Wand BM, O’Connell NE. Transcutaneous

electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) for neuropathic pain in

adults. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017;(9):CD011976. doi:

1002/14651858.CD011976.pub2

Khadilkar A, Odebiyi DO, Brosseau L, Wells GA. Transcutaneous

electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) versus placebo for

chronic low-back pain. Cochrane Database Syst Rev.

;(4):CD003008. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003008.pub3

Gibson W, Wand BM, Meads C, Catley MJ, O’Connell NE.

Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) for chronic

pain – an overview of Cochrane Reviews. Cochrane Database Syst

Rev. 2019;2019(4):CD011890. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011890.pub3

French SD, Cameron M, Walker BF, Reggars JW, Esterman AJ.

Superficial heat or cold for low back pain. Cochrane Database Syst

Rev. 2006;(1):CD004750. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004750.pub2

Dubois B, Esculier JF. Soft-tissue injuries simply need PEACE

and LOVE. Br J Sports Med. 2019;54(2):72-3. doi: 10.1136/

bjsports-2019-101253

Alves AN, Fernandes KP, Deana AM, Bussadori SK, MesquitaFerrari RA. Effects of low-level laser therapy on skeletal

muscle repair: a systematic review. Am J Phys Med Rehabil.

;93(12):1073-85. doi: 10.1097/PHM.0000000000000158

Chow RT, Johnson MI, Lopes-Martins RA, Bjordal JM. Efficacy

of low-level laser therapy in the management of neck pain: a

systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised placebo or

active-treatment controlled trials. Lancet. 2009;374(9705):1897-

doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(09)61522-1

Yamaura M, Yao M, Yaroslavsky I, Cohen R, Smotrich M,

Kochevar IE. Low level light effects on inflammatory cytokine

production by rheumatoid arthritis synoviocytes. Lasers Surg

Med. 2009;41(4):282-90. doi: 10.1002/lsm.20766

Downloads

Published

2020-03-03

Issue

Section

Original Research

How to Cite

Electrophysical agents in clinical practice of orthopedic and sports physical therapists in Brazil. (2020). Fisioterapia E Pesquisa, 27(2), 202-209. https://doi.org/10.1590/1809-2950/19019727022020