The importance of clinical experience for the measurement of scoliosis curve in children by Cobb technique
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1590/1809-2950/18001826032019Keywords:
Spine, X-Rays, Reproducibility of ResultsAbstract
| Scoliosis is defined as a deformity with lateral deviation of the spine in the coronal plane, torsion of the spine and trunk, and disturbances in the sagittal profile. This postural alteration is evaluated by anteroposterior incidence radiography using the Cobb method. The objective of this study was to verify the influence of evaluator experience on inter- and intra-rater reliability of the Cobb angle of scoliosis curvatures in children. In total, 39 patients aged 7 to 18 years with idiopathic scoliosis were included in this study. The exams were evaluated by two physical therapists, a chiropractor and a physical therapy student. Each evaluator rated each exam twice and the second evaluation occurred after seven days, characterizing the intra-rater reliability. Furthermore, the first evaluations provided the inter-rater reliability. Statistical analysis was performed with intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC), Bland-Altman analysis, descriptive analysis of mean absolute deviation, standard error of measurement, and minimum detectable chance. Correlations ranged from good (ICC>0.5) for intra-rater reliability among professionals to weak (ICC=0.4) for the inexperienced evaluator. The inter-rater reliability of the professional’s evaluations was good (ICC=0.6) and the same analysis with the presence of an inexperienced evaluator was weak (ICC=0.3). Evaluations among professionals showed less variability of measurements and standard deviation values compared to the inexperienced evaluator. The measurement of the angles of the scoliosis through the Cobb method carried out by experienced professionals showed better agreement as well as intra- and inter-rater reliability, lower standard deviation, and variability among the measurements.
Downloads
References
Weiss HR, Negrini S, Rigo M, Kotwicki T, Hawes MC, Grivas
TB, et al. Indications for conservative management of
scoliosis (guidelines). Scoliosis Spinal Disord. 2006;1(1):1. doi:
1186/1748-7161-1-5
Weinstein SL. Natural history. Spine. 1999;24(24):2592-600.
Rosenfeldt MP, Harding IJ, Hauptfleisch JT, Fairbank JT. A
comparison of traditional protractor versus Oxford Cobbometer
radiographic measurement: intraobserver measurement
variability for Cobb angles. Spine. 2005;30(4):440-3. doi:
1097/01.brs.0000153401.78638.cb
Gstoettner M, Sekyra K, Walochnik N, Winter P, Wachter, R,
Bach CM. Inter- and intraobserver reliability assessment of
the Cobb angle: manual versus digital measurement tools. Eur
Spine J. 2007;16:1587-92. doi: 10.1007/s00586-007-0401-3
Mehta SS, Modi HN, Srinivasalu S, Chen T, Suh SW, Yang
JH, Song HR. Interobserver and intraobserver reliability of
Cobb angle measurement: endplate versus pedicle as bony
landmarks for measurement: a statistical analysis. J Pediatr
Orthop. 2009;29(7):749-54. doi: 10.1007/s00247-009-1464-6
Zhang J, Lou E, Le LH, Hill DL, Raso JV, Wang Y. Automatic Cobb
measurement of scoliosis based on fuzzy Hough Transform
with vertebral shape prior. J Digit Imaging. 2009;22(5):463-72.
doi: 10.1007/s10278-008-9127-y
Carman DL, Browne RH, Birch JG. Measurement of scoliosis
and kyphosis radiographs. Intraobserver and interobserver
variation. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1990;72(3):328-33.
Geijer H, Beckman KW, Jonsson B, Andersson T, Persliden
J. Digital radiography of scoliosis with a scanning method:
initial evaluation. Radiology. 2001;218(2):402-10. doi: 10.1148/
radiology.218.2.r01ja32402
Gross C, Gross M, Kuschner S. Error anlaysis of scoliosis curvature
measurement. Bull Hosp Jt Dis Orthop Inst. 1983;43(20):171-7.
Potter BK, Rosner MK, Lehman Jr RA, Polly Jr DW, Schroeder
TM, Kuklo TR. Reliability of end, neutral and stable vertebrae
identification in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Spine.
;30:1658-63. doi: 10.1097/01.brs.0000170290.05381.9a
Loder RT, Urquhart A, Steen H, Graziano G, Hensinger RN,
Schlesinger A, et al. Variability in Cobb angle measurements
in children with congenital scoliosis. J Bone Joint Surg Br.
;77(5):768-70.
Cobb J. Outline for the study of scoliosis. Instr Course Lect.
;5:261-75.
Fleiss JL. The design and analysis of clinical experiments. New
York: John Wiley & Sons; 1986.
Ritter R, Nagasse Y, Ribeiro I, Yamazato C, Oliveira FMD,
Kusabara R. Comparison of Cobb angle measurement in
scoliosis by residents and spine experts. Coluna/Columna.
;15(1):13-6. doi: 10.1590/S1808-185120161501147274
Lenke LG, Betz RR, Harms J, Bridwell KH, Clements DH, Lowe
TG, et al. Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: a new classification to
determine extent of spinal arthrodesis. J Bone Joint Surg Am.
;83(8):1169-81. doi: 10.2106/00004623-200108000-00006
Ogon M, Giesinger K, Behensky H, Wimmer C, Nogler M, Bach
CM, et al. Interobserver and intraobserver reliability of Lenke’s
new scoliosis classification system. Spine. 2002;27(8):858-62.
Allen S, Parent E, Khorasani M, Hill DL, Lou E, Raso JV. Validity
and reliability of active shape models for the estimation of cobb
angle in patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. J Digit
Imaging. 2008;21(2):208-18. doi: 10.1007/s10278-007-9026-7
Troyanovich SJ, Harrison DE, Harrison DD, Holland B, Janik
TJ. Further analysis of the reliability of the posterior tangent
lateral lumbar radiographic mensuration procedure: Concurrent
validity of computer- aided X-ray digitization. J Manipulative
Physiol Ther. 1998;21(7):460-7.
Ylikoski M, Tallroth K. Measurement variations in scoliotic angle,
vertebral rotation, vertebral body height, and d intervertebral
disc space height. J Spinal Disord. 1990;3(4):387-91.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2019 Fisioterapia e Pesquisa
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
