How much occlusion time is necessary to assess maximal inspiratory pressure by the unidirectional expiratory valve method in subjects without artificial airway?

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.1590/1809-2950/18036526012019

Keywords:

Maximal Respiratory Pressures, Respiratory Muscles, Muscle Strength

Abstract

The aim of this study was to determine how much occlusion time is necessary to obtain maximal inspiratory pressure (MIP) by the unidirectional expiratory valve method in subjects without artificial airway. Thirty-one subjects aged 18-60 years were evaluated. MIP was evaluated by the standard method (MIPstan) and by the unidirectional expiratory valve method MIPuni, with the order of evaluation determined randomly by lot. For MIPuni measurement, a digital vacuum manometer was attached to a unidirectional expiratory valve and an orofacial mask for 20 seconds of occlusion. During this period, all subjects were encouraged to make maximal respiratory efforts. To define the optimum duration of the maneuver, the 20 seconds of effort were partitioned at every five-second interval (0-5s, 0-10s, 0-15s, 0-20s). The time intervals for obtaining MIPuni were compared with the one-way ANOVA test. The mean values of the standard method and the unidirectional expiratory valve method were compared using the paired Student’s t-test. The significance level was established at 5%. The mean values for the MIPstan (-102.5±23.9 cmH2O) presented a statistically significant difference as compared to the mean values for MIPuni (-117.3±24.8 cmH2O; p<0.001). Maximal peak values for MIPuni were achieved within the 20-second time window, which differed significantly from the peak values obtained during the first five seconds (p=0.036). The occlusion time necessary to record MIP by the unidirectional expiratory valve method in collaborative subjects without artificial airway should be of at least 20 seconds.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Black LF, HyatÇt RE. Maximal respiratory pressures: normal

values and relationship to age and sex. Am Rev Respir Dis.

;99(5):696-702. doi: 10.1164/arrd.1969.99.5.696

Sclauser Pessoa IM, Franco Parreira V, Fregonezi GA, Sheel AW,

Chung F, Reid WD. Reference values for maximal inspiratory

pressure: a systematic review. Can Respir J. 2014;21(1):43-50.

doi: 10.1155/2014/982374

American Thoracic Society; European Respiratory Society. ATS/

ERS Statement on respiratory muscle testing. Am J Respir Crit

Care Med. 2002;166(4):518-624. doi: 10.1164/rccm.166.4.518

Souza RB. Pressões respiratórias estáticas máximas. J Pneumol.

;28(Suppl 3):S155-65.

Marini JJ, Smith TC, Lamb V. Estimation of inspiratory muscle

strength in mechanically ventilated patients: the measurement

of maximal inspiratory pressure. J Crit Care. 1986;1(1):32-8. doi:

1016/S0883-9441(86)80114-9

Truwit JD, Marini JJ. Validation of a technique to assess maximal

inspiratory pressure in poorly cooperative patients. Chest.

;102(4):1216-9. doi: 10.1378/chest.102.4.1216

Caruso P, Friedrich C, Denari SD, Ruiz SA, Deheinzelin D. The

unidirectional valve is the best method to determine maximal

inspiratory pressure during weaning. Chest. 1999;115(4):1096-

doi: 10.1378/chest.115.4.1096.

Yamaguti WPS, Alves LA, Kauss IAM, Galvan CCR, Brunetto AF.

Comparison between maximal inspiratory pressure measure by

one-way valve method and conventional method in patients

under weaning from invasive mechanical ventilation. Rev Bras

Ter Intensiva. 2004;16(3):142-5.

Monteiro LS, Veloso CA, Araújo S, Figueiredo LC, Terzi RGG.

Comparison of two methods of measurement of maximal

inspiratory pressure with unidirectional valve. Rev Bras Ter

Intensiva. 2004;16(2):74-7.

Monteiro LS, Veloso CA, Araújo S, Terzi RGG. Comparison of

two methods for measurement of maximal inspiratory pressure

in patients with and without alterations of the conscience’s

level. Rev Bras Ter Intensiva. 2006;18(3), 256-62. doi: 10.1590/

S0103-507X2006000300007

Guimarães FS, Alves FF, Constantino SS, Dias CM, Menezes

SLS. Maximal inspiratory pressure evaluation among noncooperative critical patients: comparison between two

methods. Rev Bras Fisioter. 2007;11(3):233-8. doi: 10.1590/

S1413-35552007000300010

Pinheiro Filho GR, Reis HFC, Almeida ML, Andrade WS,

Rocha RLS, Leite PA. Comparison and effects of two different

airway occlusion times during measurement of maximal

inspiratory pressure in adult intensive care unit neurological

patients. Rev Bras Ter Intensiva. 2010;22(1):33-9. doi: 10.1590/

S0103-507X2010000100007

de Souza LC, da Silva CT Jr, Lugon JR. Evaluation of the

inspiratory pressure using a digital vacuometer in mechanically

ventilated patients: analysis of the time to achieve the

inspiratory peak. Respir Care. 2012;57(2):257-62. doi: 10.4187/

respcare.01228

Grams ST, Kimoto KY, Azevedo EM, Lança M, Albuquerque

AL, Brito CM, et al. Unidirectional expiratory valve method

to assess maximal inspiratory pressure in individuals without

artificial airway. PLoS One. 2015;10(9):e0137825. doi: 10.1371/

journal.pone.0137825

Miller MR, Hankinson J, Brusasco V, Burgos F, Casaburi R,

Coates A, et al. Standardisations of spirometry. Eur Respir J.

;26(2):319-38. doi: 10.1183/09031936.05.00034805

Pereira CAC, Sato T, Rodrigues SC. New reference values for

forced spirometry in white adults in Brazil. J Bras Pneumol.

;33(4):397-406. doi: 10.1590/S1806-37132007000400008

Grant S, Aitchison T, Henderson E, Christie J, Zare S, McMurray

J, et al. A comparison of the reproducibility and the sensitivity

to change of visual analogue scales, Borg scales, and Likert

scales in normal subjects during submaximal exercise. Chest.

;116(5):1208-17. doi: 10.1378/chest.116.5.1208

Published

2019-02-02

Issue

Section

Original Research

How to Cite

How much occlusion time is necessary to assess maximal inspiratory pressure by the unidirectional expiratory valve method in subjects without artificial airway?. (2019). Fisioterapia E Pesquisa, 26(1), 65-70. https://doi.org/10.1590/1809-2950/18036526012019