Validade e confiabilidade da versão brasileira do World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule em pessoas com cegueira
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1590/1809-2950/17013126012019Resumen
La World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule (WHODAS 2.0) es una herramienta desarrollada por la Organización Mundial de la Salud (OMS), la que se utiliza para medir la discapacidad y la incapacidad, basándose en el modelo de la Clasificación Internacional del Funcionamiento de la Discapacidad y de la Salud. La versión brasileña de WHODAS 2.0 fue traducida por la OMS y puesta a disposición para su uso en 2015. Este estudio pretende validar la versión brasileña de WHODAS 2.0 para uso en personas con ceguera. Participaron 56 personas con ceguera (promedio de edad: 48,4±13,6 años). Se utilizaron dos herramientas de evaluación: la versión de 36 ítems de WHODAS 2.0 y la World Health Organization Quality of Life-bref (WHOQOL-abreviado). Las propiedades psicométricas probadas fueron: consistencia interna, test-retest y validez de criterio. Hubo una buena confiabilidad test-retest (ICC≥0,63). Los valores de α de Cronbach mostraron una buena consistencia interna en la mayoría de las áreas, excepto en el subdominio de actividades escolares o de trabajo (α=0,55). La validez del criterio fue adecuada, con correlaciones moderadas entre los dominios de WHODAS 2.0 y las áreas de WHOQOL-bref. Los resultados demuestran la validez de WHODAS 2.0 para evaluar la funcionalidad de las personas con ceguera.
Descargas
Referencias
Moreira L. Cegueira sob a visão médica. In: Mosquera C,
organizador. Deficiência visual: do currículo aos processos
de reabilitação. Curitiba: Editora do Chain; 2014 [cited 2019
Jan 29]. p. 67-92. Available from: https://bit.ly/2RJKaNS
Masini EFS. A educação do portador de deficiência visual:
as perspectivas do vidente e do não vidente. Em Aberto.
;13(60):61-74. doi:10.24109/2176-6673.emaberto.13i60
Nunes S, Lomônaco JFB. O aluno cego: preconceitos e
potencialidades. Psicol Esc Educ. 2010;14(1):55-64. doi:10.1590/
S1413-85572010000100006
World Health Organization. International Classification of
Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF). 2001 [cited 2016 Apr
. Available from: https://bit.ly/2SclVnA
World Health Organization. WHO Disability Assessment
Schedule 2.0 (WHODAS 2.0). 2011 [cited 2016 Apr 11]. Available
from: https://bit.ly/2G5DX7Q
Federici S, Meloni F, Mancini A, Lauriola M, Belardinelli
MO. World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule II: contribution to the Italian Validation. Disabil Rehabil.
;31(7):553-64. doi:10.1080/09638280802240498
Castro SS, Leite CF. Avaliação de saúde e deficiência: manual
do WHO Disability Assessment Schedule (WHODAS 2.0)
[Internet]. Uberaba: Universidade Federal do Triângulo Mineiro;
[cited 2019 Jan 24]. Available from: https://bit.ly/2HuHhf8
Folstein MF, Folstein SE, McHugh PR. “Mini-mental state”:
a practical method for grading the cognitive state of
patients for the clinician. J Psychiatr Res. 1975;12(3):189-98.
doi:10.1016/0022-3956(75)90026-6
Brucki SMD, Nitrini R, Caramelli P, Bertolucci PHF, Okamoto
IH. Sugestões para o uso do mini-exame do estado mental no
Brasil. Arq Neuro-Psiquiatr. 2003;61(3B):777-81. doi:10.1590/
S0004-282X2003000500014
Lourenço RA, Veras RP. Mini-mental state examination:
psychometric characteristics in elderly outpatients.
Rev Saúde Pública. 2006;40(4):712-9. doi:10.1590/
S0034-89102006000500023
Pawlowski J, Fonseca RP, Salles JF, Parente MAMP, Bandeira
DR. Evidências de validade do Instrumento de Avaliação
Neuropsicológica Breve Neupsilin. Arq Bras Psicol. 2008;60(2):101-16.
Vitiello APP, Ciríaco JGM, Takahashi DY, Nitrini R,
Caramelli P. Avaliação cognitiva breve de pacientes
atendidos em ambulatório de neurologia geral. Arq
Neuro-Psiquiatr. 2007;65(2A):229-303. doi:10.1590/
S0004-282X2007000200021
Castro SS, Leite CF. Translation and cross-cultural adaptation
of the World Health Organization Disability Assessment
Schedule – WHODAS 2.0. Fisioter Pesqui. 2017;24(4):385-91.
doi:10.1590/1809-2950/17118724042017
Fleck MPA, Louzada S, Xavier M, Vieira G, Chachamovich
E, Santos L, et al. Aplicação da versão em português do
instrumento abreviado de avaliação da qualidade de vida
“WHOQOL-bref.”. Rev Saúde Pública. 2000;34(2):178-83.
doi:10.1590/S0034-89102000000200012
Bland JM, Altman DG. Statistics notes: Cronbach’s alpha. BMJ.
;314(7080):572. doi:10.1136/bmj.314.7080.572
Andrade AL, Wachelke JFR. Estatística para quem não gosta
de números. Estud Psicol. 2009;26(1):109-10. doi:10.1590/
S0103-166X2009000100012
Üstün TB, Chatterji S, Bickenbach J, Kostanjsek N, Schneider M. The
international classification of functioning, disability and health: a
new tool for understanding disability and health. Disabil Rehabil.
;25(11-12):565-71. doi:10.1080/0963828031000137063
Nabais MLM, Martins CLA, Monteiro MA, Galheira WG. Estudo
profissiográfico: o encaminhamento do deficiente visual ao
mercado de trabalho. Benjamin Constant. 2000;6(15):8-23.
Brasil. Lei nº 8.213, de 24 de julho de 1991. Dispõe sobre os planos
de benefícios da previdência social e dá outras providências.
Diário Oficial da União. 1991 Jul 25 [cited 2019 Jan 24]. Available
from: https://bit.ly/1sPNdmh
Baron M, Schieir O, Hudson M, Steele R, Kolahi S, Berkson L, et
al. The clinimetric properties of the World Health Organization
Disability Assessment Schedule II in early inflammatory arthritis.
Arthritis Rheum. 2008;59(3):382-90. doi:10.1002/art.23314
Chisolm TH, Abrams HB, McArdle R, Wilson RH, Doyle
PJ. The WHO-DAS II: psychometric properties in the
measurement of functional health status in adults with
acquired hearing loss. Trends Amplif. 2005;9(3):111-26.
doi:10.1177/108471380500900303
Kutlay ŞK, Ayşe A, Elhan AH, Öztuna D, Koç N, Tennant A. Validation
of the World Health Organization disability assessment schedule
II (WHODAS-II) in patients with osteoarthritis. Rheumatol Int.
;31(3):339-46. doi:10.1007/s00296-009-1306-8
Scorza P, Stevenson A, Canino G, Mushashi C, Kanyanganzi F,
Munyanah M, et al. Validation of the “World Health Organization
Disability Assessment Schedule for Children, WHODAS-Child”
in Rwanda. PLoS One. 2013;8(3):e57725. doi:10.1371/journal.
pone.0057725
Guilera G, Gómez-Benito J, Pino Ó, Rojo JE, Cuesta MJ,
Martínez-Arán A, et al. Utility of the World Health Organization
disability assessment schedule II in schizophrenia. Schizophr
Res. 2012;138(2-3):240-7. doi:10.1016/j.schres.2012.03.031
Meesters JJL, Verhoef J, Liem ISL, Putter H, Vlieland TPMV.
Validity and responsiveness of the World Health Organization
disability assessment schedule II to assess disability in
rheumatoid arthritis patients. Rheumatology. 2010;49(2):326-
doi:10.1093/rheumatology/kep369
Garin O, Ayuso-Mateos JL, Almansa J, Nieto M, Chatterji S,
Vilagut G, et al. Validation of the “World Health Organization
Disability Assessment Schedule, WHODAS-2” in patients with
chronic diseases. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2010;19(8):51.
doi:10.1186/1477-7525-8-51
Küçükdeveci AA, Kutlay Ş, Yıldızlar D, Öztuna D, Elhan AH, Tennant
A. The reliability and validity of the World Health Organization
Disability Assessment Schedule (WHODAS-II) in stroke. Disabil
Rehabil. 2013;35(3):214-20. doi:10.3109/09638288.2012.690817
Wolf AC, Tate RL, Lannin NA, Middleton J, Lane-Brown A,
Cameron ID. The World Health Organization Disability
Assessment Scale, WHODAS II: reliability and validity in
the measurement of activity and participation in a spinal
cord injury population. J Rehabil Med. 2012;44(9):747-55.
doi:10.2340/16501977-1016
Zhao HP, Liu Y, Li HL, Ma L, Zhang YJ, Wang J. Activity limitation
and participation restrictions of breast cancer patients receiving
chemotherapy: psychometric properties and validation of
the Chinese version of the WHODAS 2.0. Qual Life Res.
;22(4):897-906. doi:10.1007/s11136-012-0212-9
World Health Organization. Global data on visual impairments
[Internet]. 2012 [cited 2019 Jan 24]. Available from: https://
bit.ly/1F3hrEM
Beaton DE, Bombardier C, Guillemin F, Ferraz MB. Guidelines
for the process of cross-cultural adaptation of self-report
measures. Spine. 2000;25(24):3186-91.
Mokkink LB, Terwee CB, Patrick DL, Alonso J, Stratford PW, Knol
DL, et al. The COSMIN study reached international consensus
on taxonomy, terminology, and definitions of measurement
properties for health-related patient-reported outcomes. J Clin
Epidemiol. 2010;63(7):737-45. doi:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2010.02.006
Arieta CEL, Oliveira DF, Lupinacci APC, Novaes P, Paccola M,
Jose NK, et al. Cataract remains an important cause of blindness
in Campinas, Brazil. Ophthalmic Epidemiol. 2009;16(1):58-63.
doi:10.1080/09286580802575032
Carlozzi NE, Kratz AL, Downing NR, Goodnight S, Miner
JA, Migliore N, et al. Validity of the 12-item World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0 (WHODAS
0) in individuals with Huntington disease (HD). Qual Life Res.
;24(8):1963-71. doi:10.1007/s11136-015-0930-x
Downing NR, Kim JI, Williams JK, Long JD, Mills JA, Paulsen
JS. WHODAS 2.0 in prodromal Huntington disease: measures
of functioning in neuropsychiatric disease. Eur J Hum Genet.
;22(8):958-63. doi:10.1038/ejhg.2013.275
Federici S, Meloni F, Mancini A, Lauriola M, Olivetti BM.
World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule
II: contribution to the Italian validation. Disabil Rehabil.
;31(7):553-64. doi:10.1080/09638280802240498
Guilera G, Gómez-Benito J, Pino Ó, Rojo E, Vieta E, Cuesta MJ,
et al. Disability in bipolar disorder: the 36-item World Health
Organization Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0. J Affect
Disord. 2015;(174):353-60. doi:10.1016/j.jad.2014.12.028
Magistrale G, Pisani V, Argento O, Incerti CC, Bozzali M,
Cadavid D, et al. Validation of the World Health Organization
Disability Assessment Schedule II (WHODAS-II) in patients
with multiple sclerosis. Mult Scler. 2015;21(4):448-56.
doi:10.1177/1352458514543732
Schiavolin S, Ferroli P, Acerbi F, Brock S, Broggi M, Cusin A, et
al. Disability in Italian neurosurgical patients: validity of the
-item World Health Organization Disability Assessment
Schedule. Int J Rehabil Res. 2014;37(3):267-70. doi:10.1097/
MRR.0000000000000064
Tazaki M, Yamaguchi T, Yatsunami M, Nakane Y. Measuring
functional health among the elderly: development of the
Japanese version of the World Health Organization Disability
Assessment Schedule II. Int J Rehabil Res. 2014;37(1):48-53.
doi:10.1097/MRR.0000000000000032
Descargas
Publicado
Número
Sección
Licencia
Derechos de autor 2019 Fisioterapia e Pesquisa
Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución-CompartirIgual 4.0.