A ARGUMENTAÇÃO DO TRATADO TEOLÓGICO POLÍTICO E AS TENSÕES INERENTES AO PROJETO SECULAR MODERNO

Authors

  • Anthony Lourimar Siqueira de Queiros Ateneo Pontificio Regina Apostolorum

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.11606/issn.2447-9012.espinosa.2020.169494

Keywords:

Spinoza; Theological Political Treatise; secularism; freedom; religion; politics

Abstract

Abstract:  In his Theological Political Treatise Spinoza lays the groundwork for the secular project of separation between religion and public life which will be characteristic of Western politics throughout Modern and Contemporary Ages. This project, however, is marked by a number of tensions which can already be seen in Spinoza’s work. This article tries to delineate the philosopher’s argument, identify and make explicit its main concepts and point to some of the tensions still working within the secular project, tensions which arise from the philosophical reasoning employed by this project since its inception, as can be seen in Spinoza’s work.

 Keywords: Spinoza; Theological Political Treatise; secularism; freedom; religion; politics

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

ALQUIE F. (1991). Le rationalisme de Spinoza. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.

CALVETTI C. G. (1968), Spinoza: I presupposti teoretici dell’irenismo etico. Milão: Società Editrice Vita e Pensiero.

CANTONE R. (1997), Introduzione al Trattato Teologico-Politico. Turim: UTET.

DINI A. (1999), Introduzione al Trattato Teologico-Politico. Milão: Rusconi.

GARRETT D. (1996), The Cambridge Companion to Spinoza. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

HOBBES, T. (1998), Leviathan. Oxford, Nova Iorque: Oxford University Press.

KANT I. (1992), A religião nos limites da simples razão. Tradução de Artur Mourão. Lisboa: Edições 70.

MACHEREY P. (1992), Avec Spinoza, études sur la doctrine et l’histoire du spinozisme. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.

MACHEREY P. , A propos de la difference entre Hobbes et Spinoza in BOSTRENGHI D. (1992), Atti del Convegno Internazionale Urbino - 14-17 ottobre 1988. Nápoles: Bibliopolis.

MIGNINI F. (1997), Introduzione a Spinoza. Roma-Bari: Editori Laterza.

SPINOZA B., Epistolario, in GEBHARDT C. (1925), Spinoza Opera volume IV, Heidelberg: Heidelberg/Carl Winters Universitätsbuchhandlung.

SPINOZA B., Ethica, in GEBHARDT C. (1925), Spinoza Opera volume II, Heidelberg: Heidelberg/Carl Winters Universitätsbuchhandlung.

SPINOZA B., Tractatus Theologicus Politicus, in GEBHARDT C. (1925), Spinoza Opera volume III, Heidelberg: Heidelberg/Carl Winters Universitätsbuchhandlung.

SPINOZA B., Tractatus Politicus, in GEBHARDT C. (1925), Spinoza Opera volume III, Heidelberg: Heidelberg/Carl Winters Universitätsbuchhandlung.

STRAUSS L. (1996), La critique de la religion chez Spinoza ou les fondements de la science spinoziste de la Bible, Paris: Les Éditions du Cerf. (Tradução em francês de Die Religionkritik Spinozas als Grundlage seiner Bibelwissenschaft, Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft).

TOMÁS DE AQUINO (1888), Pars prima Summae Theologiae a quaestione I ad quaestionem XLIX. Roma: Typographia Polyglotta de Propaganda Fide.

TOMÁS DE AQUINO (2005), Sulla Verità. Milão: Bompiani.

VERNIÈRE P. (1982), Spinoza et la pensée française avant la Révolution. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.

VAN BUNGE, W. e KLEVER, W. (1994). Disguised and overt Spinozism around 1700 – Papers presented at the International Colloquium held at Rotterdam 5-8 October 1994. Leiden, Nova Iorque, Colônia: E.J. Brill.

VISENTIN S. (2001), La libertà necessaria: teoria e pratica della democrazia in Spinoza. Pisa: Edizioni ETS.

WITTGENSTEIN L. (1963), Tractatus Logicus Philosophicus. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp.

Published

2020-12-29

Issue

Section

Artigos

How to Cite

Queiros, A. L. S. de . (2020). A ARGUMENTAÇÃO DO TRATADO TEOLÓGICO POLÍTICO E AS TENSÕES INERENTES AO PROJETO SECULAR MODERNO. Cadernos Espinosanos, 43, 499-528. https://doi.org/10.11606/issn.2447-9012.espinosa.2020.169494