Efficacy and safety of cumaru syrup as complementary therapy in mild persistent asthma: a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled study

Authors

  • Elisete Mendes Carvalho Federal University of Ceará; School of Medicine; Department of Physiology and Pharmacology; Clinical Pharmacology Unit
  • Gilmara Holanda da Cunha Federal University of Ceará; School of Medicine; Department of Physiology and Pharmacology; Clinical Pharmacology Unit
  • Francisco Vagnaldo Fechine Federal University of Ceará; School of Medicine; Department of Physiology and Pharmacology; Clinical Pharmacology Unit
  • Célia Regina Amaral Uchôa Federal University of Ceará; School of Medicine; Department of Physiology and Pharmacology; Clinical Pharmacology Unit
  • Manoel Odorico de Moraes Filho Federal University of Ceará; School of Medicine; Department of Physiology and Pharmacology; Clinical Pharmacology Unit
  • Fernando Antônio Frota Bezerra Federal University of Ceará; School of Medicine; Department of Physiology and Pharmacology; Clinical Pharmacology Unit
  • Maria Elisabete Amaral de Moraes Federal University of Ceará; School of Medicine; Department of Physiology and Pharmacology; Clinical Pharmacology Unit

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.1590/S1984-82502012000400006

Keywords:

Amburana cearensis^i1^sphytoter, Cumaru syrup^i1^seffic, Asthma^i1^streatm

Abstract

Amburana cearensis is a medicinal plant known as "cumaru". It is used in Northeast Brazil in the treatment of respiratory diseases. This was a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study, with the aim of evaluating the efficacy and safety of cumaru syrup as complementary therapy in mild persistent asthma. The study consisted of 3 phases, pre-treatment, treatment and post-treatment. The primary efficacy outcome was comparison of the changes reported by patients of the cumaru and placebo groups after treatment, using the "Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire" (AQLQ). The secondary outcome was the effect of cumaru syrup on lung function based on spirometry. The results showed that in the cumaru group, the proportion of patients who had global improvement in asthma symptoms was significantly greater (61.90%, P=0.0009) than in the placebo group (9.52%). Only the spirometric parameters Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) and Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 second (FEV1) showed significant intergroup differences in post-treatment (P<0.05). The hematological and serum chemistry tests performed in the pre-treatment and post-treatment showed no statistically significant differences (P>0.05). Adverse events were reported by 3 patients (14.29%) in the cumaru group and 3 patients (14.29%) in the placebo group. All adverse events were considered non-serious and mild.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Downloads

Published

2012-12-01

Issue

Section

Review

How to Cite

Efficacy and safety of cumaru syrup as complementary therapy in mild persistent asthma: a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled study . (2012). Brazilian Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences, 48(4), 629-637. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1984-82502012000400006