Multivariate guard-bands and total risk assessment on multiparameter evaluations with correlated and uncorrelated measured values

Authors

  • Felipe Rebello Lourenço Departament of Pharmacy, School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2630-151X
  • Cintia Margueiro da Silva Departament of Pharmacy, School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.1590/

Keywords:

Conformity assessment, Multivariate analysis, Measurement uncertainty

Abstract

The quality, efficacy, and safety of medicines are usually verified by analytical results. Measurement uncertainty is a critical aspect for the reliability of these analytical results. The pharmacopeial compendia usually adopt a simple acceptance rule that does not consider information from measurement uncertainty. In this work, we compared decision-making using simple acceptance and decision rules with the use of guard-band for multiparameter evaluation of ofloxacin ophthalmic solution and acyclovir topical cream. Ciprofloxacin ophthalmic solution and acyclovir topical cream samples were subject to pharmacopeial tests and assays. Multivariate guard-band widths were calculated by multiplying the standard uncertainty (u) by an appropriate multivariate coverage factor (k’). The multivariate coverage factor (k’) was obtained by the Monte Carlo method. According to the simple acceptance rule, all the results obtained for ciprofloxacin ophthalmic solution and acyclovir topical cream are within the specification limits. However, the risk of false conformity decisions increases for ciprofloxacin tests. Decisions made using the simple acceptance rule and decision rules with the use of guard-band may differ. The simple acceptance rule may increase the risk of false conformity decisions when the measured value is close to the regulatory specification limits and/or when the measurement uncertainty value is inappropriately high. Nevertheless, the guard-band decision rule will always reduce the risk of false conformity decisions. Therefore, using information on measurement uncertainty in conformity assessment is highly recommended to ensure the proper efficacy, safety, and quality of medicines.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Bertanha MLG, Lourenço FR. Risk of false pharmaceutical equivalence (non-equivalence) decisions due to measurement uncertainty. J Pharm Biomed Anal. 2021;204:114269, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpba.2021.114269

» https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpba.2021.114269

Bettencourt da Silva RJN, Lourenço FR, Hibbert DB. Setting multivariate and correlated acceptance limits for assessing the conformity of items. Anal Lett. 2022;55:2011-2032, https://doi.org/10.1080/00032719.2022.2042549

» https://doi.org/10.1080/00032719.2022.2042549

Bettencourt da Silva RJN, Lourenço FR, Pennecchi FR, Hibbert DB, Kuselman I. Spreadsheet for evaluation of global risks in conformity assessment of a multicomponent material or object. Chemom Intell Lab Syst. 2019;188:1-5, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemolab.2019.02.010

» https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemolab.2019.02.010

Bettencourt da Silva RJN, Williams A. Eurachem/CITAC Guide: Setting and using target uncertainty in chemical measurement. 2015, 1st ed, Available from: http://www.eurachem.org

» http://www.eurachem.org

da Silva CM, Lourenço FR. Definition of multivariate acceptance limits (guard-bands) applied to pharmaceutical equivalence assessment. J Pharm Biomed Anal . 2023;222:115080, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpba.2022.115080

» https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpba.2022.115080

de Oliveira EC, Lourenço FR. Risk of false conformity assessment applied to automotive fuel analysis: a multiparameter approach. Chemosphere. 2021;263:128265, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2020.128265

» https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2020.128265

Dias FRS, Lourenço FR. Measurement uncertainty evaluation and risk of false conformity assessment for microbial enumeration tests. J Microbiol Methods. 2021;189:106312, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mimet.2021.106312

» https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mimet.2021.106312

Dias FRS, Lourenço FR. Top-down evaluation of the matrix effects in microbial enumeration test uncertainty. J Microbiol Methods . 2020;171:105864, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mimet.2020.105864

» https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mimet.2020.105864

Ellison SLR. Including correlation effects in an improved spreadsheet calculation of combined standard uncertainties. Accred Qual Assur. 2005;10:338-343, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00769-005-0008-5

» https://doi.org/10.1007/s00769-005-0008-5

Ellison SRL, Williams A. Eurachem/CITAC Guide: Quantifying uncertainty in analytical measurement. 2012, 3rd ed, Available from: http://www.eurachem.org

» http://www.eurachem.org

European Pharmacopeia (Ph. Eur.). European Directorate for the Quality of Medicines & HealthCare, 2020, 9th Ed.

Farmacopeia Brasileira. Agência Nacional de Vigilância Sanitária (ANVISA), 2019, 6th Ed.

Hibbert DB. The measurement uncertainty of ratios which share uncertainty components in numerator and denominator. Accredit Qual Assur. 2003;8:195-199, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00769-003-0615-y

» https://doi.org/10.1007/s00769-003-0615-y

International Conference on Harmonization of Technical Requirements for Registration of Pharmaceuticals for Human Use. ICH guideline Q8 (R2) on pharmaceutical development. Q8(R2), 2017. Available from: https://www.ema.europa.eu/en/documents/scientific-guideline/international-conference-harmonisation-technical-requirements-registration-pharmaceuticals-human-use_en-11.pdf

» https://www.ema.europa.eu/en/documents/scientific-guideline/international-conference-harmonisation-technical-requirements-registration-pharmaceuticals-human-use_en-11.pdf

International Conference on Harmonization of Technical Requirements for Registration of Pharmaceuticals for Human Use. ICH guideline Q9 (R1) on quality risk management. Q9(R1), 2023. Available from: https://www.ema.europa.eu/en/documents/scientific-guideline/international-conference-harmonisation-technical-requirements-registration-pharmaceuticals-human-use_en-17.pdf

» https://www.ema.europa.eu/en/documents/scientific-guideline/international-conference-harmonisation-technical-requirements-registration-pharmaceuticals-human-use_en-17.pdf

International Conference on Harmonization of Technical Requirements for Registration of Pharmaceuticals for Human Use. ICH guideline Q10 on pharmaceutical quality system. Q10, 2015. Available from: https://www.ema.europa.eu/en/documents/scientific-guideline/international-conference-harmonisation-technical-requirements-registration-pharmaceuticals-human_en.pdf

» https://www.ema.europa.eu/en/documents/scientific-guideline/international-conference-harmonisation-technical-requirements-registration-pharmaceuticals-human_en.pdf

International Conference on Harmonization of Technical Requirements for Registration of Pharmaceuticals for Human Use. ICH guideline Q14 on analytical procedure development. Q14, 2022. Available from: https://www.ema.europa.eu/en/documents/scientific-guideline/ich-guideline-q14-analytical-procedure-development-step-2b_en.pdf

» https://www.ema.europa.eu/en/documents/scientific-guideline/ich-guideline-q14-analytical-procedure-development-step-2b_en.pdf

International Conference on Harmonization of Technical Requirements for Registration of Pharmaceuticals for Human Use. ICH guideline Q2(R2) on validation of analytical procedures. Q2(R2), 2022. Available from: https://www.ema.europa.eu/en/documents/scientific-guideline/ich-guideline-q2r2-validation-analytical-procedures-step-2b_en.pdf

» https://www.ema.europa.eu/en/documents/scientific-guideline/ich-guideline-q2r2-validation-analytical-procedures-step-2b_en.pdf

Joint Committee for Guides in Metrology. JCGM 106:2012, Evaluation of measurement data - The role of measurement uncertainty in conformity assessment. 2012, Available from: http://www.bipm.org

» http://www.bipm.org

Kuselman I, Pennecchi FR, Bettencourt da Silva RJN, Hibbert DB. Conformity assessment of multicomponent materials or objects: risk of false decisions due to measurement uncertainty - a case study of denatured alcohols. Talanta. 2017a;164:189-195, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.talanta.2016.11.035

» https://doi.org/10.1016/j.talanta.2016.11.035

Kuselman I, Pennecchi FR, Bettencourt da Silva RJN, Hibbert DB. Risk of false decision on conformity of a multicomponent material when test results of the components’ content are correlated. Talanta . 2017b;174:789-796, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.talanta.2017.06.073

» https://doi.org/10.1016/j.talanta.2017.06.073

Lombardo M, da Silva CM, Lourenço FR. Conformity assessment of medicines containing antibiotics - a multivariate assessment. Regul Toxicol Pharmacol. 2022;136:105279, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.yrtph.2022.105279

» https://doi.org/10.1016/j.yrtph.2022.105279

Lourenço FR, Bettencourt da Silva RJN. Risk of false conformity decisions of multicomponent items controlled by correlated measurement results due to the sharing of analytical steps. Talanta . 2019;196:174-181, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.talanta.2018.12.021

» https://doi.org/10.1016/j.talanta.2018.12.021

Milde D, Pluháček T, Kuba M, Součková J, Bettencourt da Silva RJN. Measurement uncertainty evaluation from correlated validation data: determination of elemental impurities in pharmaceutical products by ICP-MS. Talanta . 2020;220:121386, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.talanta.2020.121386

» https://doi.org/10.1016/j.talanta.2020.121386

Morgado V, Palma C, Bettencourt da Silva RJN. Bottom-up evaluation of the uncertainty of the quantification of microplastics contamination in sediment samples. Environ Sci Technol. 2022;56:110890-110890, https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.2c01828

» https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.2c01828

Morgado V, Palma C, Bettencourt da Silva RJN. Monte Carlo bottom-up evaluation of the uncertainty of complex sample preparation: elemental determination in sediments. Anal Chim Acta. 2021;1175:338732, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aca.2021.338732

» https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aca.2021.338732

Pennecchi FR, Kuselman I, Bettencourt da Silva RJN, Hibbert DB. Risk of a false decision on conformity of an environmental compartment due to measurement uncertainty of concentrations of two or more pollutants. Chemosphere . 2018;202:165-176, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2018.03.054

» https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2018.03.054

Pluháček T, Pechancová R, Milde D, Bettencourt da Silva RJN. Bottom-up uncertainty evaluation of complex measurements from correlated performance data: determination of total Cr in yeast by ICP-MS after acid digestion. Food Chem. 2023;404:134466, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2022.134466

» https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2022.134466

Rampsey MH, Ellison SLR, Rostron P. Eurachem/CITAC Guide: Measurement uncertainty arising from sampling. 2019, 2nd ed, Available from: http://www.eurachem.org

» http://www.eurachem.org

Saviano AM, Bettencourt da Silva RJN, Lourenço FR. Measurement uncertainty for the potency estimation by rapid microbiological methods (RMMs) with correlated data. Regul Toxicol Pharmacol . 2019;102:117-124, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.yrtph.2019.01.023

» https://doi.org/10.1016/j.yrtph.2019.01.023

Separovic L, Bettencourt da Silva RJN, Lourenço FR. Determination of intrinsic and metrological components of the correlation of multiparameter products for minimizing the risks of false conformity decisions. Measurement. 2021;180:109531, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.measurement.2021.109531

» https://doi.org/10.1016/j.measurement.2021.109531

Separovic L, Bettencourt da Silva RJN, Lourenço FR. Improved spreadsheet method for determination of between components metrological correlation due to the sharing of analytical steps. Chemom Intell Lab Syst . 2019;189:161-168, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemolab.2019.05.002

» https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemolab.2019.05.002

Separovic L, Saviano AM, Lourenço FR. Using measurement uncertainty to assess the fitness for purpose of an HPLC analytical method in the pharmaceutical industry. Measurement. 2018;119:41-45, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.measurement.2018.01.048

» https://doi.org/10.1016/j.measurement.2018.01.048

Separovic L, Simabukuro RS, Couto AR, Bertanha MLG, Dias FRS, Sano AY, Caffaro AM, Lourenço FR. Measurement uncertainty and conformity assessment applied to drug and medicine analyses - a review. Crit Rev Anal Chem. 2023;53:123-138, https://doi.org/10.1080/10408347.2021.1940086

» https://doi.org/10.1080/10408347.2021.1940086

United States Pharmacopeia - National Formulary (USP-NF). United States Pharmacopeial Convention, 2021, 43rd Ed.

Weitzel MLJ, Johnson WM. Using target measurement uncertainty to determine fitness for purpose. Accred Qual Assur . 2012;17:491-495, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00769-012-0899-x

» https://doi.org/10.1007/s00769-012-0899-x

Weitzel MLJ. The estimation and use of measurement uncertainty fro a drug substance test procedure validated according to USP <1225>.Accred Qual Assur . 2012;17:139-146, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00769-011-0835-5

» https://doi.org/10.1007/s00769-011-0835-5

Williams A, Magnusson B. Eurachem/CITAC Guide: Use of uncertainty information in compliance assessment. 2021, 2nd ed. ISBN 978-0-948926-38-9. Available from: http://www.eurachem.org

» http://www.eurachem.org

Downloads

Published

2024-11-05

Issue

Section

Article

How to Cite

Multivariate guard-bands and total risk assessment on multiparameter evaluations with correlated and uncorrelated measured values. (2024). Brazilian Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences, 60. https://doi.org/10.1590/