Prevalence and factors associated with human brucellosis in livestock professionals

Authors

  • Franco Cazembe Mufinda Direcção Provincial de Saúde do Namibe-Angola
  • Fernando Boinas Universidade de Lisboa; Faculdade de Medicina Veterinária; Centro Interdisciplinar de Sanidade Animal
  • Carla Nunes Universidade Nova de Lisboa; Centro de Investigação em Saúde Pública

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.1590/s1518-8787.2017051006051

Keywords:

Brucellosis, epidemiology, Animal Husbandry, Occupational Risks, Socioeconomic Factors, Seroepidemiologic Studies

Abstract

OBJECTIVE The objective of this study is to estimate the seroprevalence of human brucellosis in livestock professionals and analyze the factors associated with brucellosis focusing on sociodemographic variables and the variables of knowledge and practices related to the characteristics of the activities carried out in livestock. METHODS This is a cross-sectional seroepidemiological study with a population of 131 workers of butchers, slaughter rooms, and slaughterhouse and 192 breeders sampled randomly in Namibe province, Angola. The data were obtained from the collection of blood and use of questionnaires. The laboratory tests used were rose bengal and slow agglutination. The questionnaire allowed us to collect sociodemographic information and, specifically on brucellosis, it incorporated questions about knowledge, attitudes, and behaviors of livestock professionals. In addition to the descriptive statistical approach, we used the Chi-square test of independence, Fisher’s test, and logistic regression models, using a significance level of 10%. RESULTS The general weighted prevalence of brucellosis was 15.6% (95%CI 13.61–17.50), being it 5.3% in workers and 16.7% (95%CI 11.39–21.93) in breeders. The statistical significance was observed between human seroprevalence and category (worker and breeder) (p < 0.001) and education level (p = 0.032), start of activity (p = 0079), and service location (p = 0.055). In a multivariate context, the positive factor associated with brucellosis in professionals was the professional category (OR = 3.54; 95%CI 1.57–8.30, related to breeders in relation to workers). CONCLUSIONS Human brucellosis in livestock professionals is prevalent in Namibe province (15.6%), where the professional category was the most important factor. The seroprevalence levels detected are high when compared with those found in similar studies.

Published

2017-01-01

Issue

Section

Original Articles

How to Cite

Mufinda, F. C., Boinas, F., & Nunes, C. (2017). Prevalence and factors associated with human brucellosis in livestock professionals. Revista De Saúde Pública, 51, 57. https://doi.org/10.1590/s1518-8787.2017051006051