Portal da USP Portal da USP Portal da USP

Editorial Policies

Focus and Scope

Categories of articles

Original Articles

Original articles include observational studies, experimental or quasi-experimental studies, program evaluation, cost-effectiveness analyses, decision making analyses and evaluation studies of diagnostic screening tests. All articles should have clear objectives and hypotheses, study design and methods, results, discussion and conclusions.

They also include theoretical essays (critical reviews and presentation of major theoretical knowledge) and articles for presentation and discussion of methodological issues and approaches to public health research. In this case, their contents should be divided into topics for guiding readers through essential elements of the subject of interest.

Before submitting a manuscript, authors should use the applicable checklist:

  • CONSORT checklist and flow chart for controlled randomized trials
  • QUOROM checklist and flow chart for systematic reviews
  • MOOSE checklist and flow chart for meta-analyses
  • STARD checklist and flow chart for diagnostic accuracy studies
  • STROBE for observational studies

Additional information:

  • Articles should have a maximum of 3,500 words, excluding abstracts, tables, figures and references.
  • Tables and figures, limited to a maximum of 5, should include only essential information. Figures should not display the same information as in Tables.
  • References, limited to a maximum of 25, should include only those strictly applicable and relevant to the subject of interest. An excess number of references in one citation should be avoided. Citation to unpublished documents or not indexed in the scientific literature (theses, reports and others) should be avoided. When they cannot be replaced, they cannot be included in the references list and should be specified in page footnotes.

Abstracts should have a structured presentation, limited to a maximum of 300 words, including Objective, Methods, Results and Conclusions. The same does not apply to theoretical essays and articles about methods and approaches applied to research studies whose narrative abstracts should be limited to 150 words.

Original research articles should have the following conventional structure: Introduction, Methods, Results and Discussion. But other formats may be accepted. Introduction should be brief, define the subject studied, summarize its relevance and highlight the gaps in the knowledge that will be addressed in the article. Methods should include a comprehensive and thorough but concise description of study population, sources of information, sampling and selection criteria, and analytical procedures, among others. Results should include only the results found without any interpretations or comparisons. The text content should add to, but not repeat, what is presented in tables and figures. Discussion should include authors' appreciation on the study limitations, confrontation of the results to other studies, authors' interpretation of outcomes and their main implications, and eventual suggestion of new lines of research. Qualitative research studies can combine Results and Discussion, or even have them named differently but following the accepted structuring of scientific articles.

Brief communications - They include brief reports of findings relevant to public health, but do not contain comprehensive analysis and robust discussion.

Additional information:

  • They should have a maximum of 1,500 words (excluding abstracts, tables, figures and references), one table or figure and no more than 5 references.
  • Its format follows the same guidelines of original articles, except for the abstract, which is non-structured and should have a maximum of 100 words.

REVIEW ARTICLES

Systematic review and meta-analysis - By summarizing results of original, quantitative or qualitative studies, these articles intend to answer to a specific question relevant to public health. They detail the search of original studies, selection criteria for studies included in the review and the summary of results obtained from the studies reviewed (which may be or not meta-analysis approaches).

Narrative review/critical review - A narrative or critical review has a descriptive-discursive content focusing on comprehensive presentation and discussion of scientific issues in public health. They should include a clear presentation of the scientific object of interest, logic argumentation, theoretical-methodological review of studies and a conclusion summary. They should be produced by experts in the area of interest or renowned specialists.

Additional information:

  • They should have a maximum of 4,000 words.
  • The abstract should have a narrative format with a maximum of 150 words. Or either a structured format, with no more than 300 words.
  • There is no limited number of references.

COMMENTARY

Their purpose is to instigate the consideration, stimulate discussion and "fuel" controversies about major public health issues. The text content should be divided into topics or subtopics and Introduction should present the subject and its relevance. References should support the main issues addressed in the article.

Additional information:

  • They should have a maximum of 2,000 words, excluding abstracts, tables, figures and references
  • Abstract should have a narrative format, up to a maximum of 150 words.
  • References should not be over 25.

Letter to the Editor, limited to a maximum of 600 words and 5 references, are also published.

 

Section Policies

Editorial

Unchecked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Unchecked Peer Reviewed

Original Articles

Unchecked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Unchecked Peer Reviewed

Communication

Unchecked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Unchecked Peer Reviewed

Technical Note

Unchecked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Unchecked Peer Reviewed

Abstract

Unchecked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Unchecked Peer Reviewed

Articles

Unchecked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Unchecked Peer Reviewed

Abstracts

Unchecked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Unchecked Peer Reviewed

Reviews and lectures

Unchecked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Unchecked Peer Reviewed

Current Comments

Unchecked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Unchecked Peer Reviewed

Comunications

Unchecked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Unchecked Peer Reviewed

Lectures and Seminars

Unchecked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Unchecked Peer Reviewed

Notes and Informations

Unchecked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Unchecked Peer Reviewed

Abstracts of thesis

Unchecked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Unchecked Peer Reviewed

Catalogue

Unchecked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Unchecked Peer Reviewed

Necrology

Unchecked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Unchecked Peer Reviewed

Thesis Abstracts

Unchecked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Unchecked Peer Reviewed

Original Articles

Unchecked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Unchecked Peer Reviewed

Current Comments

Unchecked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Unchecked Peer Reviewed

Notes and Informations

Unchecked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Unchecked Peer Reviewed

News

Unchecked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Unchecked Peer Reviewed

Abstract

Unchecked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Unchecked Peer Reviewed

Notes and Informations

Unchecked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Unchecked Peer Reviewed

Editorial

Unchecked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Unchecked Peer Reviewed

Necrology

Unchecked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Unchecked Peer Reviewed

Current Comments

Unchecked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Unchecked Peer Reviewed

Current Comments

Unchecked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Unchecked Peer Reviewed

Book Reviews

Unchecked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Unchecked Peer Reviewed

Review

Unchecked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Unchecked Peer Reviewed

Book Reviews

Unchecked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Unchecked Peer Reviewed

Actualities

Unchecked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Unchecked Peer Reviewed

Epidemiological Notes

Unchecked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Unchecked Peer Reviewed

Book Reviews

Unchecked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Unchecked Peer Reviewed

News

Unchecked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Unchecked Peer Reviewed

Book Reviews

Unchecked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Unchecked Peer Reviewed

Letters to the editor

Unchecked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Unchecked Peer Reviewed

Editor Note

Unchecked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Unchecked Peer Reviewed

Taxonomy

Unchecked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Unchecked Peer Reviewed

Current Comments

Unchecked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Unchecked Peer Reviewed

Actualities

Unchecked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Unchecked Peer Reviewed

News

Unchecked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Unchecked Peer Reviewed

Acknowledgement

Unchecked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Unchecked Peer Reviewed

Historical Memory

Unchecked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Unchecked Peer Reviewed

Catalogue

Unchecked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Unchecked Peer Reviewed

naodefinido

Unchecked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Unchecked Peer Reviewed

Acknowledgements

Unchecked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Unchecked Peer Reviewed

Recent Aspects of Public Health

Unchecked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Unchecked Peer Reviewed

Reviews

Unchecked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Unchecked Peer Reviewed

Epidemiological Note

Unchecked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Unchecked Peer Reviewed

Letters to Editor

Unchecked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Unchecked Peer Reviewed

Literature News

Unchecked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Unchecked Peer Reviewed

Point of View

Unchecked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Unchecked Peer Reviewed

Special Article

Unchecked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Unchecked Peer Reviewed

Editor Note

Unchecked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Unchecked Peer Reviewed

Letters to editor

Unchecked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Unchecked Peer Reviewed

Apêndice

Unchecked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Unchecked Peer Reviewed

Commentary

Unchecked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Unchecked Peer Reviewed

Technical Institutional Reports

Unchecked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Unchecked Peer Reviewed

Editorials

Unchecked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Unchecked Peer Reviewed

Special Section

Unchecked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Unchecked Peer Reviewed

Introduction

Unchecked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Unchecked Peer Reviewed

Comment

Unchecked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Unchecked Peer Reviewed

Brief Communications

Unchecked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Unchecked Peer Reviewed

Brief Communication

Unchecked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Unchecked Peer Reviewed

Opinion

Unchecked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Unchecked Peer Reviewed

Landmarks from the first ten years

Unchecked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Unchecked Peer Reviewed

Presentation

Unchecked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Unchecked Peer Reviewed

Part I

Unchecked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Unchecked Peer Reviewed

Part II

Unchecked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Unchecked Peer Reviewed

Part III

Unchecked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Unchecked Peer Reviewed

Comments

Unchecked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Unchecked Peer Reviewed

Sistematic Review

Unchecked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Unchecked Peer Reviewed

Brief Communication

Unchecked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Unchecked Peer Reviewed

Erratum

Unchecked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Unchecked Peer Reviewed

Homage

Unchecked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Unchecked Peer Reviewed

Essay

Unchecked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Unchecked Peer Reviewed

Systematic Review

Unchecked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Unchecked Peer Reviewed

Letters to editor

Unchecked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Unchecked Peer Reviewed

Essay

Unchecked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Unchecked Peer Reviewed

Carta ao Editor

Unchecked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Unchecked Peer Reviewed

Corrigendum

Unchecked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Unchecked Peer Reviewed

Original Articles

Unchecked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Unchecked Peer Reviewed

Metanálise

Unchecked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Unchecked Peer Reviewed

Artigo Histórico

Unchecked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Unchecked Peer Reviewed

Reviews

Unchecked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Unchecked Peer Reviewed

Foreword

Checked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Checked Peer Reviewed
 

Publication Frequency

bimonthly

 

Information services

Articles published in Revista de Saúde Pública are indexed or abstracted in the following databases:

International

  • BIOSIS
  • CAB-Abstracts
  • CAB-Health
  • EMBASE
  • Health Plan
  • HEALTHSAFE
  • Human Nutrition
  • Life Science Collection
  • Medline
  • PubMed
  • PERIODICA
  • Popline
  • Web of Sciences (ISI)
  • Wildlife Worldwide (NISC)
Latin American
  • Lilacs

The journal is also indexed in the following printed bibliographies:

  • Abstracts on Hygiene and Communicable Diseases
  • Abstracts on Zooparasitology
  • Biological Abstracts
  • Current Contents / Social & Behavioral Science
  • Entomology Abstracts
  • Excerpta Medica
  • Index Medicus
  • Microbiology Abstracts
  • Nutrition Abstracts and Reviews - Series B
  • Review Medical Veterinary Entomology
  • Safety Science Abstracts Journal
  • Social Science Citation Index
  • Tropical Diseases Bulletin
  • Veterinary Bulletin
  • Virology Abstracts

 

Copyright

Copyright by Faculdade de Saúde Pública da Universidade de São Paulo.

Any reproduction of material, even partial, is forbidden without the authorization of the Scientific editor. The use of any material for commercial ends is also prohibited.

 

Sponsors

The publication of the journal is financed with resources of the following institutions:

  • Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq)

  • Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo (FAPESP)

  • Secretaria da Saúde do Governo do Estado de São Paulo